News

The 1830 Map of North American Canals

The other day I was transcribing some old newspaper articles which may or may not be used as space filler in the American Canals newsletter, and I ran across a mention of the Conewango canal. According to the newspaper, it was supposedly connected to Seneca Lake in New York. As I had never heard of this canal, I did what everyone does and Googled it, and thus I happened upon George Armroyd’s 1830 book; A Connected View of the Whole Internal Navigation of the United State; Natural and Artificial, Present and Prospective, with A Sheet Map.

Since the book is no longer copyright protected, I will allow the author to explain a bit about his book;

“This work was undertaken in the summer of 1825, and has since been added to, as new matter from time to time has occurred for insertion. The immediate object of it is, to present as clear and distinct a view as possible, of the past progress, and present state, of a particular class of improvements, whereof an enumeration at large, with detail of circumstances, is here at tempted to be given; and, by inference, the present state and prospects of the country viewed in relation to that class of improvements, and their advancement towards a state of perfection in the internal intercourse of the whole nation.”

Or in short, the 1830 edition is an update of the 1825 edition. What follows is a 600 page listing of the state of canals in North America in 1830. There is information about every canal in the country, be it real, or possibly someone’s dream.

The book is available as a pdf download (click on the title above), and it is certainly worth doing so as I have found that books sometimes disappear as free downloads and show up as pay for print copies. There is also a mention of a map, and since Google Books doesn’t take the time to unfold and scan maps and prints, I went looking for Armroyd’s map. At first, I tried to find a copy of his book, but the internet only offers reprints. However, I was able to find a copy on the David Rumsey Map Collection. And delightfully, you can download a version of the map which I have included here.

As you can see, it is an fantastic record of canals and navigation’s in 1830. The author explained;

“The connection is designated in the map of the United States, by coloured lines, traced from point to point of one river to another, where such canals of connection already exist, or are in contemplation ; exhibiting, in consequence, (with the aid of some of the great river courses themselves,) one continuous, uninterrupted Inland Navigation, from sea to sea —from the ports of outlet and inlet on the Atlantic, through the country, and by a variety of routes, to the ports of the Gulf of Mexico.

“The Red coloured lines represent those canal works that are already finished, or well advanced ; the Yellow lines, those that are either not yet commenced, or, if commenced, not as yet actively prosecuted. All which is attempted to be explained at the proper heads of the subject in this book.

“The letters N, A, M, prefixed, one or other, at each of the articles, signify Natural, Artificial, or Mixed, in reference to the kind of navigation comprised in that article.

“The articles of canal works are numbered consecutively throughout, beginning at New-England, and ending at Florida, from No. 1 to No. 159.

“At the end of each division, into which the United States is here reduced, a summary is given of the Navigation, natural and artificial, comprised within the same, and at the end of the whole description, is given, a recapitulation, and grand summary, for the whole United States.”

This map is a nice companion to the 1905 Whitford map that I have shared prior. With Armroyd, you get all of what was possible in the mind of man, and with Whitford, you see what was actually accomplished.

Whitford on Whitford

Transcript of a manuscript letter bound in with the Cornell University copy of Whitford’s History of the Canal System of the State of New York.

Syracuse, Jan 16, 1941

Mrs. A.M. Goodman, Forest Home Drive, Ithaca, NY

Dear Madam:

Your letter of Dec. 13 reached me promptly, although it lacked definite address, but it caught me at a time when I was working night and day to finish a certain task before Christmas…(The duration of this paragraph and the next explain his delay in getting the letter to Mrs. Goodman.)

I am sorry I cannot tell you where you can get a copy of the history of the New York canals. It is nearly 14 years since I left the State Engineering Department (circa 1928) and, as I remember, the supply of these volumes had been exhausted for a considerable time then. A few years ago, when I happened to visit the department, I was told about somebody who wanted the history, and of course had failed to get one from the State, and later had found a copy through a second-hand book dealer. It was said he had paid ten dollars for it- whether for one or both volumes I do not know. While the supply lasted the State had sent the books out free of charge. (reprints are selling for over $100 and original copies are well over $400)

In writing this history I had to work largely in the State Library in Albany. I learned there, better than I had known before, the importance of placing any such work of general interest in libraries. Accordingly, when it came to distributing the volumes, since the edition was ample and I had sufficient authority to do it, I saw to it that a goodly number of the books went to the libraries in the State. There they are available for those who wish to see them, but I doubt whether any library would sell these books. Here in Syracuse the public library keeps this history, along with other irreplaceable books, in a locked case, where it can be consulted only through the librarian. Probably, however, there are many individuals who would be willing to sell their copies. Such person, I think, will have to be found through book dealers. The edition consisted of 3500 of each volume. The State printer seemed to see the wisdom of a larger edition and kept the type standing for a year or more, but the Legislature failed to make an appropriation for its printing.

You say that mine has been recommended to you as the best history of the State canals. I think I can agree with this opinion, and with due modesty, since there is no other history with which it has to compete, for it is the only canal history which has any claim to be considered at all comprehensive in the treatment of its subject. Before its appearance there were two publications which with some propriety may be called canal histories. In 1825, a little before the completion of the first two State canals, the Erie and the Champlain, there was printed a volume known as Canal Laws. This recorded the facts concerning the canals and in its way was entirely complete, being documentary in its character and consisting of a compilation of canal laws up to that time and official reports of surveys which had been made and construction work which had been done. In 1863 there was published as a part of the State Engineer’s annual report a “Documentary Sketch of the New York State Canals”, which was compiled by Sylvanus H Sweet, who in 1874 and 75 was State Engineer. It occupied 390 pages. I doubt whether this history had very wide reading beyond those persons who had something to do with canals. I understand that only three months were spent in its preparation. It had no literary style to make it appealing to the public, and perhaps most unfortunate of all for its use as a work of reference it had no index. (This is interesting as the review of Whitford also made this claim about Whitford)

In comparison, especially with Sweet’s history, it may be said that three years were spent in writing our 1905 history and at times I had from three or four to a dozen assistants helping me. The volume of the material available for its writing may be judged from the bibliography included in the second volume. It is printed in small type, which a printer call six point, and it occupies nearly 200 pages, listing simply the books then in the State Library on the subject.

Let me go a little into detail in telling what was put in this history. Sufficient time was spent to write quite complete stories of all the canals- 18 main canals, or 28, if branches and extensions and navigable feeders are counted, and there had to be included accounts of a enlargements of several of them. Then there were three chapters on the canals as a whole- one dealing with the abandonment of several lateral canals, one on the “Canals as a School of Engineering,” and one a supreme interest, a chapter of nearly a hundred and fifty pages, which dealt thoroughly with its very important subject, “The Influence of the Erie Canal,” and was undertaken in order to ascertain how well founded were the many early attestations of this influence. There were included also statistical tables and diagrams, giving facts concerning lengths, dimensions, costs, channel cross-section, tonnage carried, tolls collected and like information, including tables quite in detail of the nearly sixteen hundred structures on the canals. Then there was a chronological resume of laws and events which were important but not important enough to receive extended comment. Also there was the bibliography, of which I have spoken already, and several other features of less importance. All this might have been considered enough to complete our work, but to make it more useful there were added brief histories of all the canals of the United States and Canada, accompanied by large statistical tables of the nearly 250 of them counting branches and enlargements.

After the publication of this history there appeared in 1908, as a Buffalo Historical Society Publication, a volume, entitled, “Waterways and Canal Construction in New York State,” by Henry W. Hill. Senator Hill was long in the State Legislature and always was an ardent supported of canals. Then in 1909 A. Barton Hepburn published a volume called “Artificial Waterways and Commercial Development.” This book stressed the commercial aspect. Mr. Hepburn, I think, was a banker. The five histories I have mentioned thus far, with one I shall speak of presently, may be considered as the chief general histories of the New York canals.

Besides our 1905 history there have been other State canal publications which are of interest to the engineer. Let me tell about them. Before our history was printed and ready for distribution the State Engineer’s Department was well along in its new and perhaps its greatest work, the Barge Canal. Rather early in that work the State Engineer, following the lead of a Panama Canal publication, began issuing monthly what was call “The Barge Canal Bulletin.” This ran for eleven years. While it dealt largely with current affairs there was always at least one article in each number of general engineering interest. At the completion of the Barge Canal a history of that project was written. This is the sixth history I spoke of a moment ago. While this volume does not have the wealth of material that is contained in the 1905 history, which has been used as a book of reference by several State departments ever since it was issued, the Barge Canal History has a much better claim to literary merit than the earlier history and also to being what a real history should be. By that time I had learned better how to write such a book. Both this history and the monthly bulletin fell to my lot. This history I had to do all by myself and I was given only a year to do it- only a year because the man who had been State Engineer longest during Barge Canal construction, 10 years, and who had directed me to write this history wanted it printed before his term of office should end. Fortunately I had been so closely in touch with the whole project that I could do this, and the book was ready for distributing a month ahead of time, and in that month the edition of 2000 was virtually exhausted, a lot, however, going to libraries.

There is one other volume, published during Barge Canal construction, which I want to speak of. It is a “Book of Barge Canal Plans” and unlike the other books I have mentioned it is entirely technical. It contains 156 plates of structural plans on sheets 12 ½ by 18 ½ inches in size, together with eight pages devoted to tilte, index and a little reading matter. Every kind of structure used on the canal is included in these plans and sufficient details are shown to give an engineer a true and workable understanding of the structure. An edition of 1000 copies was printed and as one may easily imagine the cost was large. The printer’s bill alone was $5,000. This volume, of course, was sought chiefly by engineers and the State sent them out freely as well as free of charge and in addition paid the postage of nearly a dollar a copy. After I left the Department an edition of 500 more copies was printed and when I last knew several years ago, these copies were still available.

I think Mr. Goodman may like to have a copy of this Book of Plans. Also I can recommend the Barge Canal History as an interesting book to anybody who is at all interested in canal affairs. Perhaps there are parts of it which you would enjoy reading. Incidentally these two books are excellent examples of good printing. In the case of the history that is apparent on its face, but concerning the plans one has to be told that, because the sheets were printed from line cuts fastened on large wooden blocks, most careful inspection throughout the whole process was necessary to insure the printing of every least portion of each plate. It took the pressman a day to do what is called “making ready” on the press each form of some eight plates. And when the form was ready I had to hold myself in readiness to inspect it, night or day, before the printing began.

Two other publications should be mentioned. The report of the preliminary Barge Canal survey, accompanied by a large case of plans, became a classic of its kind. During Barge Canal construction the project was made more complete by the addition of terminals at the cities along the route and at many of the villages. The report of the commission appointed to investigate this subject is such as to be of interest to engineers. Then there were two reports prior to the beginning of construction which are of interest. One is that of a Committee on Canals, the body appointed by the Governor which formulated the canal policy that resulted in the Barge Canal. The other is the request of a Commerce Commission, also appointed by the Governor, to study the canal problem.

These several publications, which I have mentioned somewhat at length, constitute the chief books concerning the New York canals. Of course there have been printed many other books which have to do with canals. The State Engineer’s annual reports alone, from the first one, that of 1850, to the last, that of 1926, are full of matters of considerable interest to engineers. From the eighteen-eighties on, these reports were usually quite voluminous, from 500 to 1000 pages, and often they contained reports on studies of the numerous problems involved in canal building and maintenance. The first two decades of the present century constituted a period in which much of engineering interest was published by the State. Several departments contributed- the State Engineer, the Superintendent of Public Works, the Conservation Commission, the Highway Commission, the Health Commission, the Water Supply Commission, the State Architect, and others. In 1927 a new policy seems to have been adopted by the Public Works Department, which had absorbed most the State engineering activities. Perhaps it is heresy to say it, but it has seemed to me that indifference to the public prompted this policy rather than any desire to economize printing. Of course this policy made life easier for the persons concerned. During the years while I was publishing the Bulletin and writing the histories I had to take on also the work of editing and publishing whatever was issued by the Department and this amounted to publishing some fifty volumes. And editing and publishing, if it is carefully done, it accuracy in maintained and good printing is secured, is a very exacting job.

And now, since I have written so much, more than I intended at first, I want to say a little more- something prompted no doubt by professional pride. To one who is not the wife of an engineer I might not say it. Although I have done all these things which strictly are not engineering, I am proud to say I am one of a family of engineers. I can number an even dozen engineers or members of allied professions in my family relationships. My father had 61 years of active engineering experience, 57 of them on the State canals. His brother, a graduate of Union, was both a civil and mining engineer with considerable experience in Mexico and South America as well as many parts of the United State, some on our New York canals. My sister graduated from Syracuse in architecture, but mostly taught mathematics here in high school. My brother after graduating from Syracuse, studied three years in the School of Mines in Freiberg, Saxony, and worked in Mexico. My son and my son in law are both Massachusetts Tech men, one now with a large power company and the other as air-conditioning expert with the Federal Government, my son-in-law being the son of Geo. L. Hosmer, who until his death was an M.I.T. professor. Mr. Goodman may know of his text books, published under the names of Breed and Hosmer. I and four cousins make up the dozen. Two cousins of my father’s father (one of whom came very close to being one of the early State Engineers), one cousin of my mother, and his son, one of my own generation, with whom I have worked.

But enough of this. May I just add that I am not sorry I was force into this work. All of it should have been done. All I wrote needed to be told to the public, and quite a lot of it might never have been told or known otherwise. I think a better appreciation of the canals and what they did for the State has come out of my writing and will always continue to come out of it. One good feature of what I did seems very apparent to me. Proceeding the Barge Canal by some four or five years there was a canal project known as the Nine-Million- Dollar Improvement. It blew up in a big scandal. The Barge Canal, the largest job the State had ever undertaken up to that time, was built without a breath of scandal. I went through both jobs and they were equally clean. I am sure the publicity gained through the Barge Canal Bulletin made the difference.

Then recently I have been able to make another important contribution. In 1933 the New York State Historical Association began publication of a 10-volume history of New York State. This probably is the best history of the State ever written. In a foreword the President of the Association says of it, “None heretofore has covered the whole stretch of time, none even in a particular era has covered the whole range of human interests.” When this work was begun it became apparent, as the editor, Dr. Alexander C. Flick, then State Historian, says, that such a history could not be prepared by any single individual. Consequently about a hundred persons of recognized authority were invited to accept the responsibility for the preparation of the various portions of the work. I had the honor of being asked to write the chapter on “The Canal System and Its Influences.” This gave a chance to put such facts as people should know into a book which for untold years will be read and considered authoritative by perhaps millions of persons. If you care to read this you will find it as Chapter IX of Volume V. Since this volume is called “Conquering the Wilderness,” I was not supposed to go beyond the first half of the 19th Century in what I wrote, but I had to trespass a little.

Just a word in conclusion. Before the State Engineer, back in 1903 or 1904, directed me to write a history of the canals, writing was farthest from my mind, and I had no idea I could do it. Much to my surprise I found that I could write, and could do it in a fairly forceful and interest-compelling way. This knowledge now has become a real blessing to me. With engineering jobs passing me by in favor of younger men, I find great interest in writing, greater, I think, than I ever found in engineering, although I always delighted in that. I have found some subjects big enough to call out the best there is in me and I am hoping I may produce something well worthwhile. Perhaps engineering studies would have done the same for me, but I doubt it. Certain subject have gripped me so strongly that seldom can I tear myself away from my office before eleven or midnight.

If I have written too profusely, kindly pardon it. If I have written too intimately, please forgive it. Somehow I felt moved to try to justify my action in not sticking strictly to engineering for I used often to feel that my associates in the Department were looking down on me as one who was doing work inferior to theirs, something beneath serious consideration, even though previously I had held some important engineering positions.

Sincerely,

Nobel E. Whitford

Office Address, 36 Wood Bldg, 201 E. Jefferson St,. Syracuse, NY

The above is a transcript of a manuscript letter bound in with the Cornell University’s copy of the History of the Canal System of the State of New York. The transcription was done by Dr. John Crosby Freeman, Watkins Glen, NY.

The 1905 Map of North American Canals

Tucked away in the back pocket of Nobel Whitford’s “1905 History of the Canal System of the State of New York” is found this map of all the canals of the North America. It is likely there are few others like it. If you are not familiar with Whitford’s book, the two volumes that made up the total work are considered to be the comprehensive work on the canals of New York. It also covers many other canals of North America, as to compare them with what New York had constructed.

In a letter from Nobel to someone asking for a copy of the book, he gave some great details about the who, what, and where of his work. But in short, there were 3500 copies made and distributed to law makers, libraries, other engineers, and those who had an interest in the canals. These are now highly collectible, and bring prices of $400 plus. They can be found on Google Books, although the maps and numerous other fold outs were not scanned.

Getting back to the map, it is a remarkable work and it captures those canals and navigation’s in use or which had been used, up till 1904.

Canal Index Sheets and Site Updates

One of the great strengths of this website is the amount of information that has been made available. The American Canal Society doesn’t have a physical archives space, in fact that was a major issue when David Barber passed away was that his widow had to determine what would happen to his extensive collection of canal materials. Over the years, David had uploaded thousands of pages of information, mostly useful to the canal historian and researcher. When we moved the website, much of this material was lost as the links no longer worked. So I have been reloading these links as I find the non-functioning pages.

If you have never taken the time to check your states index sheets, go look and if you see something missing, consider adding to the collection. They are listed by state in the By State or Other Countries drop down menus.

I have also added more boat rides and I continue to work on the canal parks. There is so much out there to explore. Let me know if you see something that I have missed.

The New Explore Page Maps

We are trying something new with our Explore Page Maps which should help you find a nearby attraction.

Last fall, my wife and I took a 9 day trip around the mid-west, and many times, when we were visiting a canal park, we would be told about all the places we had missed. So it struck me that a interactive map, which would show me places nearby, might be helpful to many in the canal community.

And in an effort to cut costs, I have taken the annual Canal Boat Rides special issue and placed all those rides on a another map. Granted, many have both, but in order to make your search as easy as possible, there are now two maps. You can find these under the Explore tab. Who knows, maybe sometime in the future we might play with a “canal sites you must see” map.

The goal is to help you find those out of the way places that you might easily miss. If you know of a park or boat ride that we don’t have on the maps, let us know.

Canal Comments # 107

Terry K. Woods

June 14, 2016

LOCKING THROUGH:

I believe you can tell from the length and content of my columns that my time of writing long, extensively researched pieces is over. In the famous words of Jim Baluchi in the movie “CONTINENTAL DIVIDE”, I prefer writing a column over a book because the column is short. Still, I have a file of data that, if I live long enough, and get a tremendous surge of AMBITION may result in a book on Canal Operation. In the meantime, lets delve into the contents of that file and come up with some information on the operation of “Locking Through” on the Ohio Canal.

I’ve been able to collect very few accounts of actual boatmen performing the Locking Through task and their descriptions vary somewhat, but let’s take a read and see if we can come up with any conclusions. First, an excerpt from a letter written by James Dillow Robinson to Terry K. Woods, July 16, 1971.

Dear Terry:

., and now I’ll try to explain and answer your questions of the command “Headway”.

Q. Who gave the command, “HEADWAY?”

A. The steersman.

Q. Were the mules unhitched while ‘locking through’?

A. From the boat. Towline released from the boat.

Q. Was boat snubbed to posts while in lock?

A. Lines were released from post after boat came to a stop. No lines attached to a boat while locking up or down.

“Headway” meant that the boat had momentum enough to make the lock and the teamster could ease up on towing so as to give slack to the towline so it could be released from the deadeye on the boat. After releasing line, mules resumed their speed to the lock.

“The command “Headway” meant to quit towing and was given at each lock whether going up or down stream. The command “Headway” was given when a boat came within about 400’ of a lock.

“To give the word “headway”, the steersman had to consider how fast the boat was being towed, how much draught. And also the current of the raceway if close to a lock. Too much headway could mean a broken snubbing line or a post pulled from the ground. I’ve never heard of either happening, but, if it did, it would mean the boat would crash against the apron or miter sill or the upper gates would be damaged, assuming the headway was right and the boat responded to the rudder.”

Another snippet of how boatmen locked through comes from Page 162 of Pearl Robert Nye’s unpublished manuscript about a fictional trip he and his family took from Cleveland to Portsmouth in 1888. Pearl’s father died in 1885 and an older Pearl, living in a rooming house in Akron in 1939, began writing this tale of what such a trip might have been like had his father lived. The story is fictional, but the details and technical facts of the canal appear to be accurate. In this excerpt, Pearl describes their passage through Lock 19 in Summit County on the Ohio Canal at Black Dog Crossing. This is the point where, now, Memorial Parkway crosses the site of the canal’s buried channel.

Locking through Lock 19 – Black Dog Crossing NYE 162

“The towline was unhooked from the (wippletree) team and cleared under the bridge, around gate (towpath side) and lower snubbing post, hooked to team, “straightened up” – and on. Soon it was over upper snubbing post and paddle stems thus making “all clear”.

“Soon the word “HO!” was given (or signal – as the water roar often made it hard to hear) and the team was stopped. The forward way “snubbed” (stopped), gates shut (closed). (I am using canal language or tongue), the boat was pulled back (by the “swell” of water) to “rest on the lower gates and (touch) keep close against them until the boat rises above the “breast of the lock” – so as not to gather too much water into the rear cabin from the flow through the “paddles”.”

Yet another description of Locking Through comes from a taped interview I conducted in March of 1970 with Mrs. Silvia Klingler in Akron Ohio. Mrs. Klingler was 76 when I interviewed her and she estimated she was 10 or 11 when this particular story happened, the last year the canal boat KATHRINE, named after her Mother, actually worked carrying coal north from the mines in Tuscarawas County.

She related to me that, early in March of 1904 or 1905, Her Step-Dad and her Mother’s Brother started their two boats early, Her Step-Dad then had gotten into a fight with the Uncle’s “Roust-About” under the Barges Street Bridge in Akron before that first trip had really gotten started. Her Step-Dad was a big man and a great fighter. That may be why his opponent “cheated” by biting a thumb. Silvia never told me who won the fight, but her Step Dad got “Blood Poisoning from the bite and, after getting both boat loads of coal at Schilling’s Coal Bank in Elizabethtown, he took to his bed and left the running of the two boats to Silvia, her mother and one helper, a Mr.’ Burns. They ran the two boats back to Akron’s paper mill. Apparently the aftermath of the big fight greatly depleted both crews. Silvia then described the difficulty of Locking Through two boats with a three-person crew, “When we come tg a lock ya had ta lock up or down. Goin ta Akron ya had ta lock up. Ya had ta fill the lock with water. An it, it’s a pretty good half hour, ta take a boat through, because ya have ta, cross the lock gates, back and forth, shut the gates on one side and go back on the other. Ya have ta start up the team. Then ya have ta stop the team. Then ya have ta go back and see if the boat’s all right ————– start up again, n’ by that time the team was getten restless. They didn’t wanna start up. Then, they’d start up, Then they’d wanna run. So ya had ta hold back or they’d break the towline. – So it was a job ta get a boat through a lock.

“And comen back with just the three of us and two boats, one of us would have ta tie up one boat while we worked the other so the boat we weren’t worken on wouldn’t drift backwards – just the way the canal run.” So there we have three instances of Locking Through, though I’ll admit that Silvia’s example was probably unique.

You’ll notice that none of the examples describe beyond getting the boat into the lock. Which might mean that leaving a lock was pretty routine. Also you’ll also notice that each example was for going up stream. That may have been more difficult, because of the slight, but existent backward current in the canal. Since Pearl’s account was of a trip from Cleveland to Portsmouth, I wonder why he described an upward course through Lock 19. I think I want to assume that during normal operation, the team stopped towing when entering a lock at a command, but I’m not sure the team was unhitched while the boat was passing through the lock. Dillow’s State Boat was practically the only craft on the canal when he boated. Pearl had a unique situation in passing the towline around bridge supports. Pearl unhitched the mules at the team. Dillow unhitched the line from the boat. I don’t believe a working boatman with a minimal crew would have wanted to take the time to get the towline back up on the boat at each lock.

What are your thoughts on this? And have any of you heard of other descriptions of Locking Through?